Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $4.99 payment
How do some scientists view the first cause, contrary to the cosmological argument?
As an act of divine intervention
As the Big Bang
As an unknown mystery
As a natural occurrence
The correct answer is: As the Big Bang
Some scientists view the first cause as the Big Bang because it represents a scientific explanation for the origin of the universe. The Big Bang theory suggests that the universe began from an extremely hot and dense state and has been expanding ever since. This perspective aligns with a naturalistic understanding of the universe's beginnings, attributing the creation of the cosmos not to a supernatural force or divine intervention but rather to a significant cosmic event that can be observed and studied through scientific methods. This contrasts with the cosmological argument, which posits that everything that exists must have a cause, ultimately leading to a first cause that is often identified as God. By looking to the Big Bang as a natural process, scientists support a view that does not necessitate a divine explanation for the universe's existence.